There are only a few that make me get down and paw the ground, Asia is one.
I've always had a thing for her.
Besides, her Father is on of the true visionary masters
There are only a few that make me get down and paw the ground, Asia is one.
I've always had a thing for her.
Besides, her Father is on of the true visionary masters
Not into women with tats.
Not into women with tats.
Aaaaah so narrow minded dude, a couple of tat's who cares. It's the person itself my friend, it's the person themselves. Asia is independent, but not selfish, mind of her own and very talented. Then of course her father is the visionary director/filmmaker Dario Argento so it's in the genes. I could never understand those who desire empty headed bimbos who haven't a brain or a will of their own. I've always hand a thing for creative, independent, self sufficient women, that to me is the greatest aphrodisiac.
But then again I know it's in the genes because my mother and my stepmother are both very independent and self sufficient. What can I say, I'm my father's son
Upon reading Pagan's last post a singular thought burst forward as if carried upon a lightening bolt sent by the Greek gods - Oedipus Alert!
Regarding tattoos - they neither signify independence or deep thought - generally speaking of course. I have no personal preferences regarding tattoos on a women, although I have seen some rather beautiful and tasteful (pun intended) if not interestingly located flesh art. Two come to mind as I sit here reflecting upon history - the cherry pie and the beaver rank right at if not near the top of my list.
Now back from my brief mental digression I shall expound upon the important traits/characteristics critical in selecting a female partner; first she should be of an appropriate high/weight proportion, next a flat head is preferred so as to allow a can of beer to rest securely upon it when in position and lastly she must be able to suck an orange through a straw. Why worry about tattoos?