Skip to main content

There still may be a chance

3 replies [Last post]
firecapt1305
firecapt1305's picture
Offline
Newb
RtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Sep 20 2008
Posts:
There still may be a chance

Conservatives' manifesto an effort to jump-start resurgence
Steven Thomma | McClatchy Newspapers
last updated: February 17, 2010 06:22:39 PM

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — With polls and recent elections suggesting a possible comeback for Republicans, a group of prominent conservatives unveiled a statement of principles Wednesday called Constitutional Conservatism that they hope will guide a new era of governing.

"A year ago, some pundits claimed that conservatism was effectively dead. But today, as revelations about Washington's futility in addressing America's problems continue to mount, the movement is alive and poised for a resurgence of Constitutional Conservative leadership," former Attorney General Edwin Meese said.

Meese, who served under President Ronald Reagan, was one of several dozen conservatives who drafted and signed the statement, dubbed the Mount Vernon Statement because they introduced it at a museum that once was part of George Washington's Virginia estate of the same name.

Others noted that they were following in the footsteps of the late conservative icon William F. Buckley Jr. and others who signed a similar statement in 1960.

"Fifty years ago, the federal government threatened to grow exponentially," said Edwin Feulner Jr., the president of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research center. "Visionaries then gathered in Sharon, Connecticut, to articulate essential principles of American governance. Today, that threat is even greater, and so we must articulate anew the nature of Constitutional Conservatism in the 21st century."

The statement reaffirms their goal of a limited government coupled with a strong national defense. "Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law," said the statement from a group that included such figures as American conservative Union President David Keene; Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council; and Grover Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform.

"Each one of these founding ideas is presently under sustained attack. In recent decades, America's principles have been undermined and redefined in our culture, our universities and our politics. … The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant."

Just as conservatives oppose Democratic President Barack Obama's expansion of the federal government, the call for a Constitutional Conservatism also was an alternative to Republican former President George W. Bush's "compassionate conservatism."

Many conservatives balked at the rapid rise in non-defense spending under Bush, and at the expansion of unchecked government power in the name of fighting terrorism after the 2001 attacks.

The signers of the statement, which by design excluded elected officials, warned the three branches of modern conservatism that each should mind the other, and that none should pursue greater federal government power in the name of its own cause.

"A Constitutional Conservatism unites all conservatives through the natural fusion provided by American principles," the group said.

"It reminds economic conservatives that morality is essential to limited government, social conservatives that unlimited government is a threat to moral self-government and national security conservatives that energetic but responsible government is the key to America's safety and leadership role in the world."

It also appeared to step back from the fiery anti-government talk heard in some wings of the "tea party" movement.

"The conservatism of the Constitution limits government's powers but ensures that government performs its proper job effectively," the statement said.

"It refines popular will through the filter of representation. It provides checks and balances through the several branches of government and a federal republic."

***************************************************************

Mod Edit:  Cleaned up post and posted link

Mod Comment:  Please insure to always post link to credit source

__________________

Pelosi will make it all better, just ask her.

Pagan
Pagan's picture
Offline
Site Admin
RtH Site AdminRtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Posts:
Re: There still may be a chance

All I can say is "talk is cheap", the RNC has shown itself to be even worse than the DNC in regards to pigs at the trough and Big Government.  My opinion is to fire every single one of these pricks for at least the next 4 elections, maybe more.  Anyone who is an incumbent no matter what party they belong to fire the prick.  Then introduce legislation that dissolves

  1. Their retirement plan
  2. Health plan (put them on Medicaid)

Every single one, no exceptions!

The time to burn the fucking castle down has long since past

burn whitehouse

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines “Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli

Mysandrist Fool
Mysandrist Fool's picture
Offline
Thought Criminal
RtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Sep 20 2008
Posts:
Re: There still may be a chance

That's the problem today. The politicians get involved with over thinking the solutions rather than getting back to basics. The ensuing result is chaos. That, in turn, gives them job security, as all they have to do is further confuse the public with the "blame game"....

__________________

Looking for peace, and finally getting it...... Smiling

Pagan
Pagan's picture
Offline
Site Admin
RtH Site AdminRtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Posts:
Re: There still may be a chance

Mysandrist Fool wrote:

That's the problem today. The politicians get involved with over thinking the solutions rather than getting back to basics. The ensuing result is chaos. That, in turn, gives them job security, as all they have to do is further confuse the public with the "blame game"....

One of the many things that stuns me about the so called "Progressives", they scream about the "illegal wars, corruptions, evil big corporate" etc.  But their only solution is to give these same assholes more power and control.

Please will someone explain to me what logic they are using, if any? Puzzled

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines “Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli