Skip to main content

Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

5 replies [Last post]
Pagan
Pagan's picture
Offline
Site Admin
RtH Site AdminRtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Posts:
Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

Sarkozy's Contempt for Obama
By Jack Kelly - Real Clear Politics | Sep 29, 09

Juan PeronThe contempt with which the president of France regards the president of the United States was displayed in public last week.

Nicolas Sarkozy was furious with Barack Obama for his adolescent warbling about a world without nuclear weapons at a meeting Mr. Obama chaired of the United Nations Security Council last Thursday (9/24).

"We must never stop until we see the day when nuclear arms have been banished from the face of the earth," President Obama said.

What infuriated President Sarkozy was that at the time Mr. Obama said those words, Mr. Obama knew the mullahs in Iran had a secret nuclear weapons development site, and he didn't call them on it.

‘President Obama dreams of a world without weapons...but right in front of us two countries are doing the exact opposite," Mr. Sarkozy said.

"Iran since 2005 has flouted five Security Council resolutions," Mr. Sarkozy said. "North Korea has been defying Council resolutions since 1993."

"What good has proposals for dialogue brought the international community?" he asked rhetorically. "More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe out a UN member state off the map."

If the Security Council had imposed serious sanctions on the regimes which are flouting UN resolutions, the resolution Mr. Obama proposed about working toward nuclear disarmament wouldn't have been so meaningless, Mr. Sarkozy implied.

"If we have courage to impose sanctions together it will lend viability to our commitment to reduce or own weapons and to making a world without nuke weapons," he said.

The extent of President Obama's naivete - or duplicity - was on display Friday at the G20 summit when the president, flanked by Mr. Sarkozy and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, revealed to the American public that Iran had a second nuclear weapons site on a military base near the holy city of Qom.

News reports indicated Mr. Obama had been briefed on the site before his inauguration. But he's been conducting his foreign policy as if the mullahs could be trusted.

"Iran has been put on notice," President Obama said in Pittsburgh.

Iran responded to being "put on notice" by testing Monday two ballistic missiles that could carry a nuclear warhead 1,200 miles.

It was to protect Europe from such missiles that the ABM system President Obama abruptly cancelled earlier this month was designed.

Obama administration officials said the ABM cancellation - regarded as a betrayal by Poland and the Czech Republic, where the missiles and radars were to be located - actually improved U.S. security, because it has made Russia more amenable to sanctions against Iran.

The UN Security Council has never passed strong sanctions against Iran because Russia and China have vetoed them. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said he still doesn't like economic sanctions, but will support them if diplomacy fails. China remains opposed.

President Obama shouldn't count on Russian support, said Soviet expert David Satter.

"Words are cheap for the Kremlin and the Iranians are aware of this," he said. "The Russians, having endorsed sanctions, will now find hundreds of reasons why any specific sanctions package is unfair...The reason is that support for Iran is Russia's most important trump card in foreign relations and there is little likelihood they will give it up."

Iran has been put on notice before. At the G8 meeting in Italy in July, Mr. Obama and other leaders set a "firm deadline" of Sep. 10 for the Iranians to make a serious offer to negotiate about their nuclear program. When the mullahs blew him off, Mr. Obama quietly extended the deadline until December.

December could be too late. "Tehran soon could have humankind's most frightening weapon if substantial diplomatic progress is not made in the coming days," Rep. Howard Berman (D-Cal), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee said Saturday (9/26).

If severe economic sanctions are not imposed immediately, in months if not in weeks, only a military strike will b e able to prevent an Iranian bomb.

But after sternly lecturing Iran on its international obligations Friday, President Obama didn't call for sanctions. He called for more negotiations. And then, as the Iranians were spitting in his eye with the missile test, he jetted off to Copenhagen to lobby to have the 2016 Olympics held in Chicago.

No wonder Nicolas Sarkozy holds him in contempt.

*****************************************************************************************

Let's see Mr. President you earn the Contempt from democratically elected Presidents like Sarkozy and support people like Zelaya who attempts to make himself dictator for life like Hitler and Castro.  Then you earn support and admiration from two bit piss ant dictators like Chevez, damn we really see your true colors don't we?  One Finger Salute!

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines “Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli

andrew25
andrew25's picture
Offline
Newb
Joined: Sep 14 2009
Posts:
Re: Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

I think the cozying up with dictators and theocratic mullahs are taking a worst turn. When there is a need to condemn, leaders have to do that irrespective of what oil prices have to say. I still don't believe Iran would give up its enrichment program irrespective of how much we encourage the mullah regime.

Boanerges
Boanerges's picture
Offline
Thought Criminal
RtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Sep 20 2008
Posts:
Re: Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23583.htm

 

You should check out this link. I wonder if it's true.

__________________

"There is nothing more permanent than a "temporary" government program"
"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one...."
-- James Madison, letter to Edmund Pendleton, January 21, 1792

Mysandrist Fool
Mysandrist Fool's picture
Offline
Thought Criminal
RtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Sep 20 2008
Posts:
Re: Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

Good post, Boan. And, its good to keep in mind. I'm not a big fan of Sarkozy, but he did have a point with Obama here. What made me wonder was Obama's response. He clearly might have something up his sleeve here that none of us are aware of. And, that would would an improvement over the past eight years of sword rattling that also accomplished nothing. I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt here as this is not an easy fix.

 

We'll see what back door diplomacy brings us, if anything....

__________________

Looking for peace, and finally getting it...... Smiling

Pagan
Pagan's picture
Offline
Site Admin
RtH Site AdminRtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Posts:
Re: Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

As I've been saying about Obama, same fucking asshole, different mask.

I remember listening to an interview with Arron Russo about 8 years ago.  He grew up with the Rockefeller's, he said what broke up their friendship is them telling him about the global plan.  One of it being that the plan is to go into Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran.  It's about the control of energy, food, money etc.

Welcome to as Daddy Bush said, "The New World Order".

It's all falling into place, isn't it?

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines “Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli

Pagan
Pagan's picture
Offline
Site Admin
RtH Site AdminRtH Blogger - Click here for RtH Thought Criminals
Joined: Aug 22 2008
Posts:
Re: Obama's Foreign Policy Standing

The silence from the Party Hacks is deafening, isn't it?  And they're the ones pushing for scum like this in Washington to gain more more power through controlling their healthcare.

The fucking hypocrisy and ignorance is truly amazing. Puke

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines “Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli