Skip to main content

American Sovereignty at Risk

For sometime now I have had a belief that Obama has a bigger hidden agenda he is quietly promoting. Having us distracted by the current economic crisis serves this agenda well while also putting into play a debt structure that will pin us to a wall with but only one way out - Transnationalism!

Obama has made it very clear where he stands on the U.S. Constitution, "the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf".

To further this transnationalism agenda Obama has recently appointed a major proponent of this concept as the new Legal Counsel for the U.S. State Department, Harold Koh. Here is a recent article dealing with this appointee and the danger of transnationalism concerning its direct threat to National Sovereignty.

Obama Nominee Harold Koh: Shamefully Weak Defender of American Sovereignty
Renee Taylor

In yet another disastrous appointment, President Barack Obama has nominated former Yale University dean, Harold Koh, to be the State Department’s legal advisor. The average American - unless familiar with the ultra-liberal, put-America-last circuit - probably doesn’t know anything about Harold Koh, including his disdain for the rule of American law in America, where instead he favors American judges to interpret the Constitution according to other nations’ legal “norms”.

Unbelievable you say? Well, this is the same administration that has given us such oxymoronic appointments as Timothy “Tax Cheat” Geithner for Treasury Secretary and Janet “Man-caused Disasters” Napolitano for Homeland Security Secretary; why not trot out Harold “I Heart the UN and the International Criminal Court” Koh for America’s State Department’s legal advisor?

In a speech made to Heartland Alliance’s Midwest Light of Human Rights Awards in June, 2008, Harold Koh gave some very interesting insights into his thinking. In the speech, Koh accused the United States of “human rights violations” in Guantanamo Bay, where detainees have healthy meals and showers – probably for the first time in their lives – as well as more religious freedom than the average American public school student. Mr. Koh goes on to express concern that Jack Bauer, the fictional lead character in the popular series 24, is leading the global community into thinking Americans regularly commit “crimes against humanity.” What escapes Mr. Koh is the fact that Jack Bauer is make-believe, while the terrorists who beheaded journalist Daniel Pearl and countless others are terrifyingly real and, of course, not mentioned in his speech. Curious logic, you say? We agree.

Harold Koh’s disdain for American sovereignty is evident as the speech wears on. His support for the International Criminal Court, which would include Americans being tried in such court, would be laughable if it weren't so serious. The man who will be legal advisor to the State Department can put Americans, probably mostly our valiant military – our husbands, wives, sons and daughters – at the mercy of an international court for nothing more than defending our nation and doing their jobs...and he well might. He praises a type of tribunal for our citizens and soldiers while condemning the United States for putting enemy combatants before a military tribunal of its own instead of giving the enemy full access to American laws provided for only American citizens in American courts. Crazy, huh? That’s our boy Koh.

While Harold Koh continued with this sort of rhetoric for some time, nowhere in his speech did he condemn Islamic nations for their gross human rights violations against women and young girls, Christians, Jews and those of a faith other than Islam, or for the horrific, torturous deaths suffered by innocent men and women around the world held hostage by radical Islamic terrorists. In Harold Koh, you get a man with a “blame American first” agenda, which is to rip apart the Constitution, tear away the power of the American people and rule of law in favor of the United Nations’ idea of justice, whatever that is, along with an international court that has zero regard for the U.S. Constitution.

Not enough for you?

Harold Koh believes and recently stated publicly - according to New York lawyer, Steven Stein,who was present at an address Harold Koh gave to the Yale Club in 2007 - that Shariah (Islamic law) can have a place in the American court system in “appropriate” cases.

Author Nonie Darwish recently gave FamilySecurityMatters.org a chilling insight into Shariah Law as a body of law that advocates mad-dog-class citizenship for, and the abuse of, women and young girls. Beyond this, Harold Koh advocates Shariah Law for American courts even though Shariah is thoroughly incompatible with a democracy:

Shariah Law believes in the integration of mosque and state while a democracy believes in the separation of church/temple and state;
Shariah Law believes in the subjugation (indeed in the execution in certain circumstances) of women and minorities while a democracy believes in the emancipation of women and minorities;
Shariah Law believes in the subjugation of Jews and Christians and other non-Muslim peoples while a democracy believes that people should be free to worship as they please…

Need we go on? For what conceivable purpose would we allow such a system to step one toe inside America’s hallowed courtrooms, governed by the (equally hallowed) U.S. Constitution, and sully it and us?

While this administration has already begun its un-American plans to seize and control private businesses (General Motors, for example), it is at the same time cultivating the demise of our legal system – a system backed by the Constitution and states’ rights – in favor of “international” law, including some aspects of Shariah law, as suggested by Koh himself.

Harold Koh speaks of condemning America for human rights violations: nothing calls out more for the need to condemn than his personal approval of Shariah Law in “appropriate” cases, perhaps the most crippling and stifling of any laws in the world that affect a human being’s rights. He should be ashamed of himself, and so should President Obama for endorsing such a sacrilege through this man’s nomination.

As parents, we must decide what future we want for our children. We cannot turn back the results of this election – an election where voters cast ballots based upon “feeling”, not fact; and where such voters now are feeling “buyer’s remorse” as the nation continues its freefall into government control and “globalism,” the latter in which Harold Koh is a key player.

No longer is it a partisan issue – it is an issue of right and wrong and, as Mark R. Levin writes in his latest blockbuster book, it is a choice between liberty and tyranny, the latter a condition Shariah Law knows well…as does Harold Koh.

Note to Obama: the world is not a “global community,” you will never be its organizer and the American people – unlike, apparently, you - treasure our uniqueness and sovereignty vis-à-vis the rest of the world.

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

Pagan's picture

This brings something that through my own observations has lead me to this conclusion. Where you've got people dreaming of a Star Trek future where we have a clean wonderful world where everyone in the Galaxy speaks English. I look at more of a reality of the future as that depicted in Ridley Scott's Blade Runner. A future where Corporations have completely replaced governments and the people are assets and consumers.

I see 1/3 of the world pushing for this with the Rhodes Scholars fulfilling Cecil Rhodes dream. Then 1/3 of the world bringing about Jihad so they can get reach Paradise and be rewarded with their 100 Virgins. Then of course there's the other 1/3 who prophisize Armageddon with the Beast and the Mark of the Beast. In their attempt to thwart "The Beast" are actually bringing it about with the Society they are actually creating. But they really don't care because they have the "Rapture" to save them. Barf!
So who pays for this radical agenda of the fanatics? Everyone and even the planet itself, they're all seem to be on a course of self destruction. If one is to really think about it, think what we could accomplish if we changed the focus of all these resources they are using to destroy themselves. Hell I believe our only course of saving the species called "Man" is to get off this rock and to expand into the Galaxy. Face the reality, we're running out of real estate and resources. In order to survive we need to expand, reach out and grow. But with these nut jobs and Zealots running things we just seem to be circling the bowl, know what I mean Eye-wink

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

Pagan's picture

This started well before Obama, he's just one of the many "Tools" that have been used. Carter was/is a large part of it also, though Reagan has been repeatedly held up as the villain by the hard left for his "deregulation" and "free markets", but Carter was/is a huge supporter of it also. Clinton also is in the camp with the "Free Traders" and pushing a Global agenda. Then we cannot leave out the two Bushies we've had. Look at Daddy Bush with his speeches and "The New World Order", Dubya pushed us into the situation even more. So Obama is just continuing the plan that has been laid out.

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

AstuteObserver's picture

You get no disagreement Pagan on those points. I just find it interesting the overt moves being made by the current admin. My thought is that with all the distractions currently available Obama is in fact not letting a good crisis go to waste.

As a Constitutionalist I find these moves to be of grave concern. I actually like our sovereignty and all the bullshit that comes with it - at least we have some form of recourse when wronged. If we are under a form of nebulous international control there is nowhere to go to address and correct abuses. Not that we have been able to accomplish that within our borders to any great extent to date.

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

Fremen's picture

It's a condition of any Administration that believes in its own righteousness and not the righteousness of the Constitution which it exists to defend. The People have to become the ultimate defenders of their Constitution and the Founders knew it all along - they weren't married to any particular form that government would take, so long as the government was an application of the rights that are protected under the Amendment process and judicious legislation. Consumerism became the system of choice for 'We the People', so Government has been able to run rampant with its bad self over there in the D of C. We have the right to pull the abscess, no questions asked, but we have whole-heartedly agreed to play some weird political game and it's very distracting. There's work to be done and it isn't going to happen overnight, this is a generational shift that will take a while to implement. Big Government will go the way of the dinosaur eventually, if not because of the People, then because there isn't enough energy to sustain it any more.

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

Pagan's picture

Problem I see it is the general population here in the U.S. is of Apathy. They just don't "give a shit", as long as they can get their cheap shit made by Chinese Christian Slaves from the Laogai in Wal-Mart and get home in time to watch "Desperate Housewives" who cares?
Skank!

America has yet to wake up, maybe this crash we're in the Middle of will shake them into reality and start looking around, I dunno. I continue to hope but I increasingly get the feeling all I'm doing is just pissing in the wind ya know. Jerk Off

Re: American Sovereignty at Risk

AstuteObserver's picture

Pagan wrote:

Quote:
I continue to hope but I increasingly get the feeling all I'm doing is just pissing in the wind ya know.

Yeah I hear that, feel much the same myself most of the time. But then I turned my back to the wind and started pissing up the rope - nothing changed except the direction I was facing! Cheers Mate!